We find no error in the court's determination that an in-court identification would be the consequence of the witness' observation of the defendant at the scene of the crime. This conclusion was supported by the testimony. Any possible violation of constitutional rights as to the failure to have counsel at the so-called lineup was not prejudicial. In view of this no further hearing is required. It is otherwise as regards the trial. The prosecution as part of its main case...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.