UNITED STATES v. DE ARMAN

No. 71-2215.

453 F.2d 409 (1971)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Alan DE ARMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied January 7, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Futlick, Fresno, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., William R. Allen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service (mutilating and destroying a draft card) case is affirmed.

An insanity defense was presented. A psychiatrist testified for the defendant and none testified for the government. But here on cross-examination the expert was badly shaken. So we believe that a counter-expert was not required here. Cf. United States v. Ingman, 9 Cir., 426 F.2d 973; and Mims v. United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases