1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 262 Md.
  5. 262 Md. 588 (1971)
 

NETHKEN v. LUSBY

[No. 443, September Term, 1970.]

262 Md. 588 (1971)

278 A.2d 550

NETHKEN v. LUSBY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur D. Preston, Jr., with whom were Luther B. Ditch, Ascanio S. Boccuti and Whiteford, Taylor, Preston, Trimble & Johnston on the brief, for appellant.

John F. Somerville, Jr., for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This dispute, an extension of the "seemingly senseless quarrel" described in Lusby v. Nethken, 256 Md. 469 (1970), concerns a counsel fee. Since we think that the trial judge, Naughton, J., has related the relevant facts, that he has stated the applicable principles of law, and that he has reached the correct legal result, we consider it appropriate to adopt his opinion as the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases