Appellants shall recover of respondent $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The seventh affirmative defense alleges the 1966 Zolmar agreement is a nullity in that it was never intended to be enforceable. The ninth affirmative defense alleges said agreement was subject to a condition precedent. Defendants may show there was, in fact, no contract, and there was no consideration. (Bernstein v. Kritzer, 253 N.Y. 410, 415-416.) The eighth affirmative defense alleges...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.