1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 469 S.W.2d
  5. 469 S.W.2d 363 (1971)
 

SANFORD v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD

469 S.W.2d 363 (1971)

Mary Bond Clifton SANFORD, Plaintiff-in-Error, v. The LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD, Defendant-in-Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

July 6, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred B. Pittman, Clay N. Saunders, Memphis, for plaintiff in error.

John B. Mack, Kent B. Monypeny, Jr., Memphis, for defendant in error.

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

Plaintiff, Mary Bond Clifton Sanford, has appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court sustaining defendant Louisville and Nashville Railroad's demurrer to her amended declaration, and dismissing her suit.

By her amended declaration Mrs. Sanford alleged that she is the sole remainderman with respect to certain lands devised by will by Edward Fitzgibbon in 1899; that defendant instituted a condemnation proceeding in 1899...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases