1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 22 Cal.App.3d
  5. 22 Cal.App.3d 60 (1971)
 

FARR v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 38961.

22 Cal.App.3d 60 (1971)

99 Cal. Rptr. 342

WILLIAM T. FARR, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 17, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cooper & Nelsen and Grant B. Cooper for Petitioner.

Robert C. Lobdell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Robert S. Warren, Dean S. Lesher, George R. Johnson, Flint & Mac Kay, Edward L. Compton, R. Garrick Ritchie, Edwin Freston, Jack B. Purcell, William Whitsett, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Howard J. Privett, Bodle, Fogel, Julber & Reinhardt, George E. Bodle, Daniel Fogel, Stephen Reinhardt, and Earl Klein as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and William F. Stewart, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

This is a petition for writ of review of an order of respondent court adjudging petitioner Farr to be in contempt for failing to answer questions put to him. We conclude that the trial court properly found petitioner to be in contempt of court.

The matter at bench is an outgrowth of the trial of Charles Manson and his codefendants for two sets of multiple...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases