CONVERSE RUBBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

Reappraisement R67/10315; Entry No. 53182.

328 F.Supp. 493 (1971)

CONVERSE RUBBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES (Mitsubishi International Corp., Party-in-Interest). UNITED STATES (Mitsubishi International Corp., Party-in-Interest) v. CONVERSE RUBBER COMPANY.

United States Customs Court, Second Division, Appellate Term.

June 24, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lamb & Lerch, New York City (Richard J. Kaplan and David A. Golden, New York City, of counsel), for American manufacturer.

L. Patrick Gray, II, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Susan C. Cassell, New York City, trial attorney), for the United States.

Lane, Young & Fox, New York City (James G. McGoldrick and William H. Fox, New York City, of counsel), for party-in-interest.

Stitt, Hemmendinger & Kennedy, Washington, D. C. (Noel Hemmendinger, Washington, D. C., of counsel), amicus curiae.

Before RAO, FORD, and NEWMAN, Judges.


FORD, Judge:

The case at bar is an application for review of the decision and judgment of the trial court which was reported in Converse Rubber Company v. United States (Mitsubishi International Corp., Party-in-Interest), 64 Cust.Ct. 779, R.D. 11716 (1970),1 and which covers an appeal for reappraisement filed by an American manufacturer. The merchandise consists of rubber soled shoes with canvas uppers which were appraised on the basis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases