Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Memorandum:
Not only does the record not support the order for increased payments on arrearages, but no fact adduced would permit the court to find that defendant willfully violated the prior order so as to subject him to a penalty pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 454 of the Family Court Act. (Matter of Atkins v. Atkins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.