1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 355 F.Supp.
  5. 355 F.Supp. 408 (1971)
 

CASE-SWAYNE CO., INC. v. SUNKIST GROWERS, INC.

No. 333-58-DWW.

355 F.Supp. 408 (1971)

CASE-SWAYNE CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

May 6, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kindel & Anderson, Los Angeles, Cal., by Roger J. Nichols and Richard A. Perkins, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff.

Beardsley, Hufstedler & Kemble, by Seth M. Hufstedler and John Sobieski, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., and Dale V. Cunningham, Sherman Oaks, Cal., and Donald D. Stark, Corona, Cal., for defendant.

AMENDED DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ONE ISSUE

DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The suit before this Court is an antitrust action which has had a long history. In the original complaint, Case-Swayne, a processor of single strength and blended orange juices, sought treble damages from Sunkist under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) for alleged monopoly and an attempt to monopolize the fruit and product fruit markets in violation of Sections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases