WEIDEMAN v. WAYNE COUNTY

Docket Nos. 11205, 11206.

36 Mich. App. 694 (1971)

194 N.W.2d 52

WEIDEMAN v. WAYNE COUNTY MURPHY v. WAYNE COUNTY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 27, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fischer, Franklin & Ford (by George Hogg, Jr., and Francis E. Bentley), for plaintiff Weideman.

Robert E. Murphy, for plaintiff Murphy.

William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Aloysius J. Suchy, Corporation Counsel, and W. Leo Cahalan, Jr., and Adam P. Angelas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for defendants.

Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and QUINN and O'HARA, JJ.


Leave to appeal denied, 386 Mich. 776.

PER CURIAM.

Each plaintiff has filed a motion to affirm upon the authority of Deneweth v. Green (1971), 385 Mich. 763, with opposition thereto by defendants. The grounds relied on by them are:

First, that while a reduction of Wayne County's supplement to the involved judicial salaries was in fact made, it was made simultaneously with an increase in the state judicial salary, and that the net salaries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases