1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 49 Wis.2d
  5. 49 Wis.2d 667 (1971)
 

BLUM v. HILLSBORO

No. 68.

49 Wis.2d 667 (1971)

183 N.W.2d 47

BLUM, d/b/a BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant, v. CITY OF HILLSBORO, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 2, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Frank M. Coyne of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief by Richard Endicott of Hillsboro, and Johns, Flaherty, Harman & Gillette of La Crosse, and oral argument by Robert D. Johns.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

For the purposes of this appeal, it would appear from the pleadings that the parties entered into a contract to do the work on the dam and lake for $47,438.50, and that the contract was let pursuant to the provisions of sec. 62.15, Stats.

In paragraph four of the complaint, the plaintiff alleged that after acceptance of the contract, the defendant through its mayor and council members inquired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases