PROCIDA v. CITY OF NEW YORK


28 N.Y.2d 681 (1971)

Carmelo Procida, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 3, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Meyerson, Moe Levine and Aaron J. Broder for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Stanley Buchsbaum and George A. Weiler of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BERGAN, BREITEL and GIBSON. Judge JASEN dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judge SCILEPPI concurs. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.


Order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that a prima facie case of negligence was made out. There was adequate evidence of notice, which the jury was warranted in accepting, adduced largely from city employees and city records.

JASEN, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to affirm.

The plaintiff, an employee of the New York City Transit Authority, was injured while driving a bus on an assigned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases