gle.com/images/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

ROMANO v. LEVITT

No. 15CV518A.

ANTHONY ROMANO, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR LEVITT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

January 18, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Romano, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


Order

Before the Court is the moving defendants' motion to sever and to change venue as to certain claims and defendants (Docket No. 34). Defendants move to (a) sever certain defendants (termed by defendants to be the "Auburn defendants") from the remaining defendants (termed "Wende defendants") and (b...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    DAVIS v. LOCAL UNION NO. | 16 Cal.App.3d 686 (1971) | pp3d6861636 | Leagle.com
     

    DAVIS v. LOCAL UNION NO. 11, INTERNAT.

    Docket No. 36744.

    16 Cal.App.3d 686 (1971)

    94 Cal. Rptr. 562

    ALBERT DAVIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 11, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Defendant and Appellant.

    Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

    April 15, 1971.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    COUNSEL

    Brundage, Neyhart, Miller, Ross & Reich and Julius Reich for Defendant and Appellant.

    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton and David A. Maddux for Plaintiff and Respondent.


    OPINION

    LILLIE, J.

    A jury found in plaintiff's favor in a malicious prosecution action brought against defendant Union and assessed both compensatory and exemplary damages against it. The Union appeals from judgment entered on the verdict, order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and order denying motion for new trial. The attempted appeal from the latter order is dismissed.

    (1a) First...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases