JAIKINS v. JAIKINS

Docket No. 10442.

36 Mich. App. 664 (1971)

194 N.W.2d 33

JAIKINS v. JAIKINS

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 27, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James G. Hartrick, for plaintiff.

Smith, Magnusson, Anderson & Chartrand, for defendant.

Before: QUINN, P.J., and DANHOF and TARGONSKI, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The question presented is whether the trial court erred in refusing to modify a judgment of divorce by terminating alimony. We hold that there was no error.

The sequence of events immediately preceding this appeal is as follows: the defendant sought modification of the judgment in a number of respects. She also sought an order holding the plaintiff in contempt. The plaintiff opposed the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases