Respondent took judgment against real estate broker Carl F. Alaimo for $9,500, consisting of $6,500 damages for fraud and $3,000 treble damages for conversion of a $1,000 fee advanced by respondent. Respondent applied for satisfaction of the judgment from the Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund (hereinafter called "the Fund"), pursuant to Business and Professions Code, section 10470 et seq.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CIRCLE OAKS SALES CO. v. SMITH
16 Cal.App.3d 682 (1971)
94 Cal. Rptr. 232
CIRCLE OAKS SALES COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BURTON E. SMITH, as Real Estate Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 15, 1971.
April 15, 1971.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas C. Lynch and Evelle J. Younger, Attorneys General, David E. Bunim and Eric Roost, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.
Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior and Richard B. Schreiber for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.