Order affirmed, without costs. It is not necessary to consider the applicability of the parol evidence rule because, in any event, the subsequent creditors and purchasers in good faith would not be bound by the undisclosed arrangements among the parties to the lending transactions. Furthermore, petitioner Hyse Realty Corp. was estopped, as Special Term properly found, because of the nondisclosure of such...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
