1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 29 N.Y.2d
  5. 29 N.Y.2d 659 (1971)
 

MATTER OF FIORE v. HECHT

29 N.Y.2d 659 (1971)

In the Matter of Louie O. Fiore et al., Respondents, v. Albert L. Hecht et al., Constituting the Dutchess County Board of Elections, Respondents, and Jack Economou, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 8, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Ostertag for appellant.

Louie O. Fiore and Ann B. Rupsis, respondents, pro se.

William V. Welch, County Attorney (Joseph D. Quinn, Jr. of counsel), for Albert L. Hecht and Robert E. Stevens, Commissioners of Elections of Dutchess County, respondents.

Albert L. Hecht, respondent in person.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JASEN and GIBSON. Dissent: Judges SCILEPPI and BREITEL. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.

Order reversed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term and the judgment of Supreme Court, Dutchess County, reinstated.

Judges SCILEPPI and BREITEL dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the cancellation of the second registration left the respondent Economou without any registration or enrollment outstanding and the subsequent registration would not be effective to reinstate his enrollment until one week after the general election of 1971 under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases