CITY OF SALEM v. KIMBALL


482 P.2d 191 (1971)

CITY OF SALEM, Respondent, v. Arlo William KIMBALL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided March 16, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Dye, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Kleen & Dye, Salem.

William G. Blair, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William J. Juza, City Atty., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.


MEMORANDUM DECISION.

This appeal involved violation of a city ordinance. Oral argument confirmed the fact that the appeal did not involve an issue as to "* * * the constitutionality of the charter provision or ordinance under which the conviction was obtained * * *." ORS 221.360.1 Therefore, in view of ORS 221.350 and 221.360, we ruled from the bench that this case be dismissed for want of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases