FULTON v. B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY


490 P.2d 178 (1971)

Robert M. FULTON, Respondent, v. B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 5, 1971.

Rehearing Denied November 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart M. Whipple, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Seitz, Whipple, Bemis & Breathouwer and James G. Breathouwer, Portland.

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Donald N. Atchison and John J. Haugh, Portland.


DENECKE, Justice.

The plaintiff was injured when a scraper he was driving blew a tire. He recovered a verdict against the defendant upon the claim that the defendant was negligent in allowing the scraper's tires to be run while in an overinflated condition and the overinflation caused the blowout. Defendant appeals.

Defendant, B.F. Goodrich Company, contends the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict. Goodrich's motion was based upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases