1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 38 A.D.2d
  5. 38 A.D.2d 629 (1971)
 

KIELMAN v. ENTER. STORES, INC.

38 A.D.2d 629 (1971)

William Kielman, Respondent, v. Enterprise Stores, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 15, 1971

The trial court's determination as to the adequacy of a jury verdict will only be disturbed by an appellate court where it can be said that the trial court's exercise of its discretion is not reasonably grounded (Hussey v. Oneida Motor Frgt., 30 A.D.2d 741). Here respondent sustained extremely serious burns to his upper torso when sparks from an acetylene torch ignited his sweat-shirt. As a result respondent was hospitalized for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases