LORENZEN v. FEUCHT


490 P.2d 176 (1971)

Robert L. LORENZEN, Appellant, v. William E. FEUCHT and Ernest M. DeWater, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 5, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold A. Fabre, Pendleton, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Fabre & Ehlers, Pendleton.

Kenneth M. Abraham, Hood River, argued the cause for respondent Feucht. On the brief were Parker & Abraham, Hood River.

James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for respondent DeWater. With him on the brief were McColloch, Dezendorf, Spears & Lubersky and Richard S. Borst, Portland.


Argued and Submitted at Pendleton October 26, 1971.

McALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiff Lorenzen brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The jury found in favor of both defendants and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The sole question is whether the court erred in submitting to the jury the charge of contributory negligence that plaintiff's headlights did not meet the standard required by ORS 483.424.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases