1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 50 Wis.2d
  5. 50 Wis.2d 609 (1971)
 

STATE v. VLAHOS

No. State 113.

50 Wis.2d 609 (1971)

184 N.W.2d 817

STATE, Respondent, v. VLAHOS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 30, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by James Koconis, attorney, and John J. Valenti of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by James J. Podell, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and E. Michael McCann, district attorney.

BEILFUSS, J.

Prior to the trial the defendant made a timely motion to dismiss the information upon the basis that the statute, sec. 945.03(2), 1967, under which he was charged and subsequently convicted, is unconstitutional because of its vagueness. The defendant-appellant also asserts that the only issue on this appeal is whether the statute is unconstitutional and void because of vagueness.

Sec. 945.03(2), Stats...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases