ROSEN v. HURSH

No. 3-71-Civ.-25.

329 F.Supp. 322 (1971)

Mrs. Jeanne ROSEN, as mother and natural guardian of her minor children, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Morris HURSH, individually and as Commissioner of Public Welfare of the Department of Public Welfare of the State of Minnesota, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

July 6, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey H. Hartje, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen. of Minnesota, and Craig R. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn. for defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs are members of the class represented in Kostohryz, et al v. Hursh, 329 F.Supp. 319 (D. Minn. July 6, 1971), and their challenge to reductions of AFDC benefits under Section VII— 2224.04 of the Minnesota Public Welfare Manual, the "stepfather" regulation, as being inconsistent with federal law is identical to that presented in Kostohryz. Our decision today...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases