1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 116 N.J.
  5. 116 N.J. Super. 531 (1971)
 

CAMARCO v. CITY OF ORANGE

116 N.J. Super. 531 (1971)

283 A.2d 122

PHILIP CAMARCO, JR., A CITIZEN AND RESIDENT OF NEW JERSEY, AND RUTH SEGLIN, A CITIZEN AND RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ORANGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GENNARO D'ANGELIS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, JOSEPH MAGRINO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, AND THOMAS J. FREDA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CLERK OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 18, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Lunin argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Mitchell Melnikoff, attorney; Mr. Lunin, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Stanley L. Wang argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LANE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANE, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that an ordinance of the City of Orange amended October 7, 1969, prohibiting loitering under certain conditions was "illegal and unconstitutional and in violation of the Constitutions of the United States and of New Jersey." On cross-motions for summary judgment the trial court entered judgment dismissing the complaint....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases