1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 480 P.2d
  5. 480 P.2d 159 (1971)
 

BOHM v. STATE

No. 950.

480 P.2d 159 (1971)

Robert H. BOHM, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

January 29, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James K. Tallman, Anchorage, for appellant.

Robert Opland, Hagans & Opland, Anchorage, for appellee.

Before BONEY, C.J., and DIMOND, RABINOWITZ and CONNOR, JJ.

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice.

After the plaintiff in a civil action has completed the presentation of his evidence, his action may be dismissed under Civil Rule 41(b) if the trial judge finds that "upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief."1 In Rogge v. Weaver2 we held that the trial judge should not grant a Civil Rule 41(b) motion to dismiss if the plaintiff has presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases