PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in not finding as a matter of law that defendant was the principal by whom plaintiff was entitled to be reimbursed for sums paid by him as surety.
The parties waived a trial by jury and the trial court heard the evidence ore tenus. In these circumstances the ruling of the trial court in favor of the defendant is presumed to be correct and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
