SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a contest between a mortgagor and his lending institution, in which the borrower who sought damages below for breach of contract and fraud, also contends that his 6 1/2% loan became usurious after it had been made. While he raises a multitude of questions, the borrower's principal contention is that he is now entitled to a recovery of the interest which he had paid under District of Columbia Code Title 28, ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
