ROGERS v. BURNOPP

[No. 54, September Term, 1971.]

263 Md. 357 (1971)

283 A.2d 367

ROGERS ET AL. T/A ROGERS AND BROWNLEY v. BURNOPP ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 10, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted by Jerome F. Connell, Sr., and E. Milton Frosburg for appellants.

Submitted by Stanford H. Franklin, Harvey S. Levin and Mandel, Rocklin, Franklin & Drue for appellees.

The cause was submitted on briefs to HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.


SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This controversy arose when John Rogers and his partner, R. Wendell Brownley (who will be referred to collectively as Rogers) endeavored to prevent Howell Q. Burnopp and his wife, Lola E. Burnopp (the Burnopps) from using a right of way which they claimed to have over the Rogers tract.

Rogers has owned since 1967 a tract of some 78 acres, which is now being subdivided, on the north side of Dicus Mill Road in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases