Judgments affirmed.
In our opinion the evidence adduced at the trial was sufficient to sustain the finding, implicit in the jury's verdict of guilty, that the defense of insanity was disproved beyond a reasonable doubt. In view of defendant's refusal to co-operate with the psychiatrist retained by the People to examine him with respect to his mental state at the time of the commission of the acts charged, we do not consider the consequent failure of the People to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
