STATE v. HOPSON


60 N.J. 1 (1971)

285 A.2d 225

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR C. HOPSON, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 20, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald T. Foley, Jr., Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Richard F. Thayer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons given by Judge Halpern in his dissenting opinion. (114 N.J.Super. 146, 148 (1971))

FRANCIS, J. (dissenting).

I vote to affirm the sentence as modified by the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For a number of years the Legislature has shown increasing concern with the problem of use of narcotic drugs and the ever...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases