1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 324 F.Supp.
  5. 324 F.Supp. 280 (1971)
 

SO GOOD POTATO CHIP CO. v. FRITO-LAY, INC.

No. 69 C 186(1).

324 F.Supp. 280 (1971)

SO GOOD POTATO CHIP CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., a Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

March 3, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. S. Sigoloff and J. E. Sigoloff, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Guilfoil, Symington & Petzall, St. Louis, Mo., and Thos. C. Shelton and Albert C. Tate, Jr., Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchen & Regenstein, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MEREDITH, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, So Good Potato Chip Company, to obtain an injunction to permanently enjoin the defendant, Frito-Lay, Inc., from manufacturing, selling, and distributing "Fritos", "Doritos", "Fandangos", and "Intermission" brand corn chips and any other corn chips within the licensed territory granted by defendant to plaintiff under a franchise agreement, dated September 29, 1957. The plaintiff also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases