BOHANAN v. BOHANAN


487 P.2d 113 (1971)

Jasper BOHANAN, Appellant, v. Marguerite BOHANAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

July 15, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Ronald I. Gevurtz, and Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland.

Edward J. Murphy, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Wheelock, Richardson, Niehaus, Baines & Murphy, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

On this appeal from a decree of divorce the plaintiff-husband contends (1) he should have been granted the decree of divorce, (2) the court, in dividing the property of the parties, was overly generous to the defendant, cross-complainant, wife, and (3) the facts did not justify an award of permanent alimony to the wife.

While the plaintiff's first two contentions are not without substance, consideration of the entire record leads us to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases