STATE v. CHARETTE

No. State 126.

51 Wis.2d 531 (1971)

187 N.W.2d 203

STATE, Respondent, v. CHARETTE a/k/a Rice, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 2, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by James R. Mattison and Becker, Kinnel, Doucette & Mattison, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by James R. Mattison.

For the respondent the cause was argued by William F. Eich, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.


CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

On appeal, the parties extensively argue the merits of the convictions. Our examination of the record in this case leads us to the decision that the merits of the convictions cannot be reached on this appeal. We reach this conclusion for two reasons: The first and most significant being that the appeal is not timely as to the convictions and therefore this court is without jurisdiction to review the convictions. Secondly, no motion for a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases