NIBEL CORP. v. OCENOFSKY


38 A.D.2d 534 (1971)

Nibel Corp., Appellant, v. Pearl Ocenofsky et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 14, 1971


Respondents shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

Affirmance is not based upon the ground that the authority of the attorney to seek or consent to adjournments of the closing date specified in the contract had to be in writing. Here it is claimed that the attorney acted with no authority at all. The circumstances, namely, the unusually long period of the adjournments, the defendants' lack of familiarity with real estate transactions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases