1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 21 Cal.App.3d
  5. 21 Cal.App.3d 551 (1971)
 

LUXOR CAB CO. v. CAHILL

Docket No. 27991.

21 Cal.App.3d 551 (1971)

98 Cal. Rptr. 576

LUXOR CAB CO., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THOMAS CAHILL et al., Defendants and Respondents; CHAUFFEURS UNION LOCAL 265, Intervener and Appellant; BEN BARKAN et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

November 26, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James C. Purcell for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Edward M. Kovach and Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson for Intervener and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Conner, City Attorney, and Edmund A. Bacigalupi, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Charles H. Blagburn for Interveners and Respondents.

OPINION

TAYLOR, P.J.

This is an appeal by Luxor Cab Company and Chauffeurs Union Local 265,1 hereafter appellants, from a judgment denying petitions for injunction and writ of mandate to prevent respondents,2 Board of Permit Appeals and Police Commissioners (hereafter collectively referred to as Board) of the City and County of San Francisco, from issuing 110 new certificates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases