FISHER v. BERNARD

No. 28 June Term 1971, Docket No. 52,748.

386 Mich. 182 (1971)

191 N.W.2d 323

FISHER v. BERNARD

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided November 9, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

van Benschoten & van Benschoten and Robert A. Grimes, for plaintiff.

Dice, Sweeney & Sullivan (by Jon Feikens), for defendants.


T.E. BRENNAN, J.

This malpractice action was tried to a jury in circuit court. Judgment for defendants was entered upon a verdict of no cause for action. After denial of motion for new trial and appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. 21 Mich.App. 260.

Of the several assignments of error, only one will be considered. It warrants reversal and remand for new trial.

Supporting her motion for new trial, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases