ELLIOTT v. DITURSI


115 N.J. Super. 452 (1971)

280 A.2d 208

ROBERT C. ELLIOTT, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RUTH I. ELLIOTT, AND RUTH I. ELLIOTT, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DOMINIC DITURSI, ALICE DITURSI, AND WINDSOR WAX COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS, AND PETER GALLAGHER AND HERTZ CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 19, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred G. Osterweil argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Schreiber and Osterweil, attorneys; Mr. Robert S. Schulman, on the brief).

Mr. Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Schreiber and Lancaster, attorneys).

Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MATTHEWS, J.A.D.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether the granting of the motion by defendants Peter Gallagher (Gallagher) and Hertz Corporation (Hertz) for judgment n.o.v. constituted reversible error.

The facts are uncomplicated. Infant plaintiff, eight years of age, was visiting his grandmother who lived on the east side of Newkirk Avenue, North Bergen, Hudson County. Newkirk Avenue is a narrow thoroughfare...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases