RUARK v. PETERSON

No. 70-138.

491 P.2d 75 (1971)

Walter RUARK, Plaintiff in Error, v. Norman J. PETERSON and Barbara J. Peterson, Defendants in Error.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

November 2, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Mueller, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Paul Q. Beacom and Ott & Caskins, William J. Caskins, Jr., Richard Ott, Denver, for defendants in error.


Selected for Official Publication.

SILVERSTEIN, Chief Judge.

This is an action for specific performance of an option contract. It was brought by the optionees, the Petersons, who are defendants in error here. After a trial to the court, judgment was entered granting specific performance. The optionor, Ruark, seeks reversal of that judgment. Ruark asserts that the Petersons did not exercise the option, in that they never made a valid tender of the purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases