FRIDENA v. PALMER

No. 10440.

107 Ariz. 455 (1971)

489 P.2d 265

Christine FRIDENA, Successor to Robert G. Begam, Executor of the Estate of Daniel T. Fridena, Jr., Appellant. v. Dean H. PALMER and Mildred T. Palmer, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Division.

Rehearing Denied November 4, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller & Haggerty, by Philip M. Haggerty, Phoenix, for appellant.

Udall, Shumway & Blackhurst, by Dale R. Shumway, Mesa, Snell & Wilmer, by Mark Wilmer, Phoenix, for appellees.


CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to grant the motion of the defendant-appellant, Daniel T. Fridena, Jr., D.O., to set aside a default and default judgment.

We are called upon to determine:

1. Whether the court had jurisdiction by reason of service of process, and 2. whether the court abused its discretion in failing to set aside the default and judgment.

On 12 April 1968, plaintiff, Dean...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases