1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 481 P.2d
  5. 481 P.2d 71 (1971)
 

IN RE HEDRICK

481 P.2d 71 (1971)

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Howard R. HEDRICK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 24, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for accused. With him on the briefs were Cake, Jaureguy, Hardy, Buttler & McEwen, Portland.

Al J. Laue, Salem, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Robert N. Gygi, Portland.

PER CURIAM.

The accused member of the bar is charged by the bar with representing conflicting interests. Both the trial committee and the Board of Governors found the accused guilty. The accused denies the charge.

Rule 7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct provides:

"A member of the state bar shall not represent conflicting interests, except with the express consent of all parties concerned after a full disclosure of the facts, and then only when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases