1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 14 Cal.App.3d
  5. 14 Cal.App.3d 530 (1971)
 

HALPIN v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 12594, 12606.

14 Cal.App.3d 530 (1971)

92 Cal. Rptr. 329

JACK HALPIN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; DOUGLAS GUARDIAN WAREHOUSE, Real Party in Interest. HYSTER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; JACK HALPIN et al., Real Parties in Interest. [Consolidated Cases.]

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 20, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fitzwilliam, Memering, Stumbos & DeMers, Louis A. DeMers, Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Rogers and Roger Smith for Petitioners and for Real Parties in Interest in No. 12606.

No appearance for Respondent.

Rust & Mills, Horvitz & Minikes, Ellis J. Horvitz and William Mayhew for Real Parties in Interest in No. 12594.

OPINION

PIERCE, P.J.

We issued an order to show cause and a stay order on the two above-captioned petitions for mandamus and/or prohibition. The Halpin-Giles petition represents interests antipodal to the Hyster Company ("Hyster") petition but the aim of both was to stay further proceedings in an action pending in the Superior Court of Sacramento County, No. 192553 ("Sacramento action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases