HANCOCK v. CONCORD

No. 6305.

111 N.H. 413 (1971)

AMANDA L. AND MARY LOUISE HANCOCK v. CITY OF CONCORD.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

December 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orr & Reno and Ronald L. Snow (Mr. Snow orally) for the plaintiffs.

Leonard J. Merski, City Solicitor (by brief and orally), for the defendant.


GRIMES, J.

The sole question in this case is whether the zoning board of adjustment could rule as a matter of law the operation of a real estate business in a general residence district is a "customary home occupation" within the meaning of the Concord ordinance which permits as an accessory use "customary home occupation such as hairdressing, laundering, preserving and home cooking . . . ." District regulations II, 45. The ordinance defines a "home occupation" as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases