1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 334 F.Supp.
  5. 334 F.Supp. 188 (1971)
 

C.L. HUTCHINS & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 4297; Protest No. 67/25245.

334 F.Supp. 188 (1971)

C. L. HUTCHINS & COMPANY, Inc., Imperial Rug Mills, Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court.

November 19, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glad & Tuttle, Los Angeles, Cal. (Robert Glenn White, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (John A. Winters, New York City, trial atty.), for defendant.

C.D. 4297; Protest No. 67/25245 on rags and scrap cordage.

RAO, Judge:

This is a motion by the Government to modify an order denying its motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction, by adding a statement that a controlling question of law is involved as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.

The purpose of this procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases