STATE v. WALKER


117 N.J. Super. 397 (1971)

285 A.2d 37

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES OSCAR WALKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 10, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. McGlynn, McGlynn, Ruprecht & Graham for appellant (Mr. Louis Ruprecht, of counsel).

Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, for respondent (Mr. Michael H. Stieber, of counsel).

Before Judges CONFORD, MATTHEWS and FRITZ.


PER CURIAM.

We granted leave to appeal from an order dismissing a motion to suppress evidence on the ground that no brief accompanied the motion, although the motion was timely filed.

We are in disagreement with the asserted proposition that defendants filing motions to suppress may routinely delay filing an accompanying brief on the facts and the law, as required by the rule, R. 3:5-7(a), on the claimed justification that advance notice to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases