IN RE BAILEY


57 N.J. 451 (1971)

273 A.2d 563

IN THE MATTER OF F. LEE BAILEY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 8, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold N. Springstead argued in support of the order.

Mr. Monroe L. Inker, of the Massachusetts bar and Mr. F. Lee Bailey, pro se, argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Respondent is a member of the Massachusetts bar who was admitted pro hac vice (R. 1:21-2, formerly R.R. 1:12-8) to represent, in the trial court, certain defendants who had been indicted for murder in two highly publicized cases pending in Passaic County. This permission was revoked by the trial judge before trial because of respondent's actions. We affirmed the revocation. State v. Kavanaugh, 52 N.J. 7

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases