FITZMAURICE v. VAN VLAANDEREN MACHINE CO.


57 N.J. 447 (1971)

273 A.2d 561

RICHARD J. FITZMAURICE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VAN VLAANDEREN MACHINE COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 8, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert G. Besser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser, attorneys).

Mr. Charles E. Villanueva argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Van Riper, Belmont & Villanueva, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

This matter involves an alleged breach of contract for professional services. The plaintiff, Richard J. Fitzmaurice, a business consultant specializing in marketing and sales, entered into an employment contract with the defendant, Van Vlaanderen Machine Company (hereafter defendant), a manufacturer of printing presses, to provide business diagnosis and interim management for one year at $52,000. The terms of the contract which were embodied in a letter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases