1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 59 N.J.
  5. 59 N.J. 444 (1971)
 

BEARS v. WALLACE

59 N.J. 444 (1971)

283 A.2d 740

DENNIS BEARS, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JANE RUFF, AND JANE RUFF, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PAUL WALLACE AND FRANCES WALLACE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, and UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 22, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert C. Garofalo argued for appellants (Messrs. Ryan, Foster & Garofalo, attorneys).

Mr. Stanley R. Bright argued for Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Messrs. Caruso & Caruso, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division upheld the trial court's determination that neither Gugliotta nor Bears was entitled to recovery from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board. Bears v. Wallace, 112 N.J.Super. 210 (App. Div. 1970). We denied certification to Gugliotta but granted certification to Bears (and to his guardian ad litem Ruff individually). Gugliotta v. Wallace,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases