BEAUTYGARD MFG. CO. ET AL. v. ST. BD. TAX COMM.

Nos. 1069A174, 1269A235, 1069A196, 1169A209, 1069A195, 1169A205, 1169A206, 1069A175, 1269A232.

148 Ind. App. 340 (1971)

266 N.E.2d 61

BEAUTYGARD MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GEESLIN; STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Rehearing denied March 9, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold C. Wagner, Wagner & Malo, of Hammond, for Beautygard Manufacturing Co.; James W. Chester, Charles T. Clifford, Chester, Clifford, Hoeppner & Houran, of Valparaiso, Lester Irons, William P. Wooden, Douglas F. Burns, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, of Indianapolis, for Bethlehem Steel Corp.; James E. Schreiner, Travis & Tinkham, of Hammond, for Jack Gray Transport, Inc.; Joseph L. Skozen, Phillip E. Bainbridge, Skozen, Stodola & Bainbridge, of Hammond, for Huniston-Keeling & Co.; G. Edward McHie, Kenneth D. Reed, Crumpacker & Abrahamson, of Hammond, for Inlander Steindler Paper Co.; Marvin E. Silverman, Ottenbeiner & Silverman, of East Chicago, for Lanman Bolt & Forge Co.; David Cohen, of East Chicago, for Marcus Auto Lease Corp.; Donald L. Gray, Sullivan & Gray, of Whiting, Kenneth D. Reed, Crumpacker & Abrahamson, of Hammond, for Queen Anne Candy Co.; William W. Fullagar, Hackbert, Rooks, Pitts, Fullagar & Poust, of Chicago, Illinois, John R. Sorbello, Carroll, Bielefeld & Barber, of Crown Point, Edward B. Raub, Jr., White, Raub, Reis & Wick, of Indianapolis, for United States Steel Corp.

Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney General, Richard C. Johnson, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Wendell C. Hamacher, Joseph S. Van Bokkelen, Deputies Attorney General, for defendants.


ORIGINAL ACTIONS

HOFFMAN, C.J.

The above causes were removed to this court pursuant to Acts 1969, ch. 204, § 5, p. 768, Ind. Stat. Anno., § 64-1004a, Burns' 1970 Cum. Supp. In each a motion to remand was filed.

These causes are now consolidated for the sole purpose of ruling upon the motions to remand.

Pursuant to order of this court dated February 19, 1970, the parties hereto were required to file motions, petitions, briefs or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases