1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 52 Wis.2d
  5. 52 Wis.2d 413 (1971)
 

BURKHALTER v. STATE

Nos. State 110-112.

52 Wis.2d 413 (1971)

190 N.W.2d 502

BURKHALTER, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 5, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs and oral argument by James H. McDermott, state public defender.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and William F. Eich, assistant attorney general; the cause was argued by Sverre O. Tinglum, assistant attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

There are six issues presented:

1. Did the defendant understand the range of punishments carried by the three violations charged?

2. Did the trial court fail to ascertain whether any promises or threats had been made in regard to the defendant's appearance?

3. Did the trial court establish that the defendant's conduct constituted the offense charged (the theft and escape charges)?

4. Did the trial court lack jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases