MEAD v. THOMAS

No. 55231.

464 S.W.2d 1 (1971)

Boyd A. MEAD and Kathryn H. Mead, Appellants, v. Cecil C. THOMAS and Etta Mae Thomas, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

March 8, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Norton & Pollard, Wm. Harrison Norton, North Kansas City, for appellants.

Frank P. Sebree, Shook, Hardy, Ottman, Mitchell & Bacon, Kansas City, for respondents.


STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Appellants sought to enjoin the respondents from using a driveway constructed over a small portion of their property. By counterclaim respondents sought a decree that they had an easement of way across the property in question by reason of adverse use. The trial court decreed the requested easement, and this appeal followed.

The factual situation is not easy to set forth, but by reproducing herein a portion of Appellants' Exhibit No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases